Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Shnoop
    Subscribe
    • HOME
    • FINANCIAL AID
    • SCHOLARSHIPS
    • STUDENT LIFE
    • CAREER
    • CAMPUS
    • HOUSING
    • TIPS
    Shnoop
    You are at:Home»Tips»Avoid Desk Rejection: Insider Tips to Meet Submission Requirements and Ethical Standards
    Tips

    Avoid Desk Rejection: Insider Tips to Meet Submission Requirements and Ethical Standards

    Share




















    Avoid Desk Rejection: Insider Tips to Meet Submission Requirements and Ethical Standards – Enago Academy



















    Session Agenda

    Good research alone doesn’t guarantee publication. Navigating the submission process can feel like traversing a maze of arbitrary and obscure rules. As a result, manuscripts are frequently rejected due to avoidable errors. Most submissions are rejected at the initial review stage, with over 50% desk rejection before further consideration. Researchers, especially non-native English speakers, often face repeated rejections and delays, often without clear feedback.

    Common reasons for desk rejection include:

    • Failing to meet journal-specific technical requirements
    • Missing declarations or essential documents
    • High levels of plagiarism or excessive repetition rates
    • Ethical issues from improper AI use

    This free webinar offers actionable guidance to help you identify and address key manuscript issues—ensuring compliance with ethical and journal submission standards. It introduces our 3-in-1 Manuscript Review Pack, designed to evaluate your manuscript’s submission readiness and help you submit with confidence while avoiding rejection.

    Key Takeaways:

    • An insider’s view of three key initial screening criteria: plagiarism, AI content detection, and manuscript structure
    • How to identify critical red flags that cause desk rejection
    • Strategies to enhance clarity, structure, and guideline compliance
    • Updates on evolving ethical and reporting standards in academic publishing

    Who should attend this session?

    • Early-career researchers preparing their first submission
    • Senior academics aiming to boost their acceptance rates
    • Authors facing desk rejections or delays due to formatting and submission issues
    • Researchers keen to stay current on evolving ethical and AI-related standards

    About the Speaker

    Dr. Amruta Kothare

    Quality Expert – Quality & Special Projects, Enago (Publication Support)

    Dr. Amruta Kothare brings deep academic and industry experience to the world of research publishing. With a Ph.D. in Life Sciences and a strong research background in breast cancer therapeutics. She has a prolific publication record in renowned scientific journals and an impressive track record of securing research grants.

    Dr. Kothare currently oversees quality control for high-impact STEM manuscripts and manages premium pre-submission services for global researchers, as a Quality Expert at Crimson Interactive Pvt Ltd. Her role places her at the intersection of research integrity, technical compliance, and publication success—making her uniquely positioned to help authors avoid the common pitfalls that lead to rejection. In addition to her leadership role, she is a Visiting Faculty in Bioanalytical Sciences and a recognized STEM education trainer, known for conducting workshops and lectures on research methodology and scientific communication.

    Register Now

    Want to conduct custom
    webinars and
    workshops?

    Inquire
    Now


    Sign-up to read more

    Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

    • 2000+ blog articles
    • 50+ Webinars
    • 10+ Expert podcasts
    • 50+ Infographics

    • Q&A Forum
    • 10+ eBooks
    • 10+ Checklists
    • Research Guides

    We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.


























    Error: Contact form not found.










    Researchers’ Poll










    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous Article8 College Students Share Their Financial Goals For The Summer
    Next Article Will There Be A U.S. Spinoff Of ‘Squid Game’? Cate Blanchett’s Cameo Teased One
    shnoop_ing3f1
    • Website

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Recent Posts
    • Orange County Places New Regulations on ICE
    • Pretending Things Don’t Hurt
    • Situationship or Humiliationship? When It Goes Too Far
    • Spring Cleaning Your Dorm Has Major Mental Health Benefits — Here’s Where To Start
    • A Love Letter to Dublin
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp

    Orange County Places New Regulations on ICE

    Pretending Things Don’t Hurt

    Situationship or Humiliationship? When It Goes Too Far

    A spent statute? (Medical Law Review)

    Scholarships of the Week (February 23 – March 1, 2026)

    Gary Meggitt on Insurance Brokers and AI (New Book Chapter)

    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms & Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.